Forensic vocabulary is not a pile of words to memorize — each term is a claim about certainty. A presumptive test can only suggest, never confirm; class characteristics narrow a group while individual characteristics point to a source. Getting the word right is getting the certainty right — and that is the whole discipline. Use “match” loosely and every result starts to sound like proof; the trained analyst has a graded vocabulary and says exactly what a comparison has earned.
Keep a running vocabulary page at the back of the case notebook; add to it every time a new term of art appears, with a one-line note on exactly what it does and does not claim. When you hit an unfamiliar term, say the boundary out loud before you look it up — that retrieval is what fixes it in memory.
| Term | Meaning | Where & what it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Locard’s exchange principle | every contact leaves a trace | Crime scene. Two objects in contact exchange material, so a scene almost always holds transferable evidence. |
| chain of custody | the documented history of an item | Every unit. The unbroken record of who held the evidence and when — a single gap can make it inadmissible. |
| class characteristics | features shared by a group | Fingerprints, trace. Narrow the field to a category (a shoe size, a fiber type) but cannot point to one source. |
| individual characteristics | features unique to one source | Fingerprints, toolmarks. Fine details that can point to a single source — the basis for individualization. |
| individualization | linking evidence to one source | Fingerprints, DNA. The strong claim that evidence came from one source — reserved for the rare cases the features justify. |
| latent print | a print invisible to the eye | Fingerprints. Left by natural skin oils — must be developed with powder, chemicals, or an alternate-light source to be seen. |
| patent print | a visible print | Fingerprints. Left in a substance like ink or dust — visible without any development. |
| plastic print | an impression in a soft surface | Fingerprints. Pressed into a pliable material such as wax or putty, leaving a three-dimensional mark. |
| minutiae | the fine ridge details of a print | Fingerprints. Ridge endings and bifurcations compared point-by-point between a latent print and a known one. |
| presumptive test | a screening test | Blood, chemical analysis. Can only suggest what a substance is — a positive narrows possibilities but never confirms. |
| confirmatory test | a definitive test | Blood, DNA. Identifies a substance with high specificity — the step that supports a claim a presumptive test cannot. |
| Term | Meaning | Where & what it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| trace evidence | tiny transferred material | Trace evidence. Hairs, fibers, glass, soil — small, easily missed, and usually class-level rather than individualizing. |
| chromatography | separating a mixture into parts | Chromatography & analysis. Pulls a mixture (ink, dye) apart into its components so their pattern can be compared. |
| Rf value | a component’s travel ratio | Chromatography. The distance a component moves divided by the distance the solvent front moves — a repeatable number for comparing samples. |
| blood typing (ABO) | sorting blood into groups | Blood & bodily fluids. Places a sample in a broad group — a class characteristic that can exclude, but cannot identify one person. |
| spatter / angle of impact | the shape and angle of a drop | Blood & bodily fluids. The geometry of a stain, read carefully, can suggest how and from where a drop traveled. |
| DNA profile / STR | a pattern of repeated DNA markers | DNA & biological. Short repeated sequences (STRs) that vary between people — the strongest biological comparison available. |
| match probability | how likely a random match is | DNA. A statistic, never proof — it states how rare a profile is, so a “match” is always a likelihood, not a certainty. |
| exclusion | ruling a source out | DNA, fingerprints. Often the most certain result available — the evidence definitively does not come from a given source. |
| striations / toolmarks | the fine scratch patterns a tool leaves | Ballistics & toolmarks. The marks a barrel or tool cuts into a surface, compared under a microscope to link — or exclude — a source. |
Don’t swallow the table in one sitting. Keep this page open during reading and lab; each time you meet an unfamiliar term, say what it claims — and what it does not claim — out loud before you check. The habit leaves your effort free for the part of forensic science that actually rewards it — judging what the evidence honestly supports.