⚛️ Weathering, Erosion & Landforms — printable rubric packet (Geology Unit 07). Print 8.5×11 portrait. Every page is designed for clipboard use while you grade at the bench.
← Back to the web rubric All rubrics
▲ Page 1 — Unit overview
Bright Minds Geology · Course Pack
Weathering, Erosion & Landforms — Unit Packet
Overview
v0.1 · Page 1 of 5

This packet is everything a parent or guide needs to assess Unit 07 at home — learning targets, the answers that count as correct, the mastery rubric, calibration examples, and a clipboard score sheet. No multiple-choice test: the student shows mastery by testing a weathering or erosion process and reading a landscape as the record of the agent that shaped it.

Unit learning targets

By the end of the Weathering, Erosion & Landforms unit, a student should be able to:

How this unit is assessed

Mastery rubric

Six criteria, each judged Not yet / Approaching / Mastered (Page 3).

Weathering & erosion lab

Test a process; connect the result to the landform it would build.

Oral check

The student reads a landscape aloud (Page 4).

Lab notebook

Process test, landform link, and evidence kept distinct.

How to read a Bright Minds rubric

You are making a decision, not adding up points. For each criterion, decide whether the work is Not yet, Approaching, or Mastered — the column language tells you which. A criterion counts as mastered only when the student can name the process from the landform and back it with evidence such as the dilute-acid test. A student carries three tokens per term; one token buys a re-do of one criterion on another day, so a single bad afternoon never sinks the unit.

▲ Page 2 — Key terms
Weathering, Erosion & Landforms · Vocabulary
Key Terms — What Counts as Correct
Vocabulary
v0.1 · Page 2 of 5

Accept any answer in the synonyms column — they are pre-approved as equivalent. The third column flags the confusions that look close but are not yet, so you can coach precisely.

Canonical answerAccepted synonymsCommon confusion / discriminator
Weathering
Mechanical weatheringphysical weatheringBreaks rock without changing it — frost wedging, exfoliation
Chemical weatheringdecompositionAlters the rock — dissolution, oxidation, hydrolysis
Carbonate dissolutionacid dissolution of limestoneDilute acid fizzes on carbonate rock; carves caves and sinkholes
Frost wedgingfreeze–thawWater freezes in cracks and pries rock apart (mechanical)
Erosion, deposition & landforms
Erosionwearing away & removalWeathered debris picked up and carried off by an agent
Depositionsediment dropAgent loses energy and drops its load, building landforms
Karstlimestone terrainCaves, sinkholes, and springs from carbonate dissolution
Moraineglacial depositRidge of unsorted debris left by glacial ice
▲ Page 3 — Mastery rubric
Weathering, Erosion & Landforms · Mastery Rubric
Six Criteria — Not yet / Approaching / Mastered
Rubric
v0.1 · Page 3 of 5
CriterionNot yetApproachingMastered
Mechanical vs. chemical weatheringTreats all weathering as the same breakdown.Names both types but cannot tell them apart in the field.Distinguishes mechanical weathering (frost wedging, exfoliation) from chemical weathering (dissolution, oxidation, hydrolysis) with evidence.
Agents of erosion & transportCannot name what moves weathered material.Lists water, wind, or ice but not how each carries its load.Explains how water, wind, and glacial ice erode and transport sediment, and how each sorts what it carries.
Landforms from processSees landforms as random shapes.Names a landform but not the agent that built it.Links an agent of erosion or deposition to the landform it produces — meanders, deltas, dunes, moraines, or karst caves.
Carbonate dissolution & karstIgnores how water dissolves and alters rock.Mentions dissolution but not which rock or why.Explains carbonate dissolution and karst using the dilute-acid fizz test and links it to cave and sinkhole formation.
Lab technique (weathering, erosion & landform investigation)Cannot design a test that isolates one process.Runs a weathering or erosion test but confounds variables.Investigates a process cleanly and links the result to the landform it would build over time.
Integration (cross-domain)Treats the science as isolated facts; makes no cross-domain connection.Names a link to history, reading, or writing but cannot defend why it matters.Connects the unit to its anchor across History · Reading · Writing (plus chosen electives) and defends why the connection matters.
What “Mastered” requires
The student names the process from the landform and backs it with field evidence — the fizz test, the sediment sorting, the frost-wedged talus — unprompted.
What does not pass
Calling a U-shaped valley “old” without naming the glacier that carved it is Not yet on criterion 3 — every landform names its agent.
Grading it at home

The split between Approaching and Mastered is process from landform: a landscape is a record of the agent that shaped it. Ask “which agent built this, and what’s your evidence?” — the fizz on limestone, the sorted sand of a dune, the unsorted till of a moraine.

▲ Page 4 — Anchor exemplars
Weathering, Erosion & Landforms · Calibration
Anchor Exemplars — To Calibrate Your Ear
Anchors
v0.1 · Page 4 of 5

Read these before you grade. They show what Mastered and Not yet actually sound like, plus the edge cases where you should coach rather than decide on the spot.

Reading a landscape

▶ Mastered
“A drop of dilute acid fizzed on the limestone but not the sandstone — that’s carbonate dissolution, chemical weathering, and it’s why this region has caves and sinkholes. The frost-wedged talus above it is mechanical: the same rock, broken but not changed.”
▶ Not yet
“The rock just wore down over time. Water and wind do it. This valley is U-shaped because it’s old, I guess.”

Integration — landscapes as records

▶ Mastered
“The same weathering and erosion that flattened ancient mountains is still shaping the land I walk on — reading a valley or a cave tells me which agent worked here and roughly how long it took.”
▶ Not yet
“Landforms just exist.” (No link to the agents that build them.)

Edge cases — coach, don’t fail

▶ Mechanical vs. chemical
Sees any breakdown as one thing. Coach: frost wedging breaks rock unchanged; dissolution alters it. The fizz test tells them apart. Worth a re-do, not a fail.
▶ Landform without an agent
Names a delta or a dune but not the water or wind that built it. Coach: every landform records its agent — start from the sediment.
▲ Page 5 — Score sheet (clipboard)
Weathering, Erosion & Landforms · Score Sheet
Unit Score Sheet — One per student
Score Sheet
v0.1 · Page 5 of 5

Student: ______________________________________    Date: _______________    Guide: _________________________

Mastery criteria — circle one per row

#CriterionDecisionNotes
1Mechanical vs. chemical weatheringNY / Appr / Mast
2Agents of erosion & transportNY / Appr / Mast
3Landforms from processNY / Appr / Mast
4Carbonate dissolution & karstNY / Appr / Mast
5Lab technique (weathering, erosion & landform investigation)NY / Appr / Mast
6Integration (cross-domain)NY / Appr / Mast

Weathering & erosion investigation — technique check

Token used this session?

☐ No    ☐ Yes — for criterion: __________    Tokens remaining: ☐ 3   ☐ 2   ☐ 1   ☐ 0

NY = Not yet · Appr = Approaching · Mast = Mastered · Unsure between two levels? Circle the lower one and note what a re-do would need.