Skip to main content
Bright Minds. Forensic Science Forensic Science course pack
See it before you commit

Look inside the Forensic Science pack.

No sign-up, no email required. Here is a real week, a real rubric, a real lab-notebook page, and a real demonstration — the actual materials, not a brochure. Every sample links to the full artifact it’s drawn from.

1 · A real week

One week, two days on the evidence.

The course runs on a two-day pulse — about two hours a day, across roughly 32 weeks. Here is week one of Unit 1 — Crime Scene & Evidence Basics: the student works a real scene before a single definition is memorized.

Concept Day · ~2 hrs
Meet a crime scene as a problem in disciplined observation — Locard’s principle that every contact leaves a trace, and the chain of custody that keeps evidence admissible. Work through how a scene is searched in a pattern, documented before anything moves, and logged so no one can question who held what.
  • Observation & Locard’s principle
  • Scene documentation
  • Chain of custody
Lab Day · ~2 hrs
Process a real mock scene — search it in a pattern, sketch it to scale with a north arrow, and photograph every item with an L-scale before you touch it. You build the record the case rests on before a single item is bagged.
  • Systematic search pattern
  • Measured sketch & scale photos
  • Collect, package & log evidence

See the full course map →

2 · A real rubric

How “mastered” is actually judged.

Every skill is scored at one of three levels against a published bar — no points, no curve. Here is one criterion from the Crime Scene & Evidence Basics rubric — sketch & scale photography — shown exactly the way a parent or guide reads it:

LevelWhat it looks like — “Measured sketch & scale photos”
DevelopingRough sketch with no measurements or scale.
ProficientSketches or photographs but omits a scale or key measurements.
MasteryProduces a measured sketch with a north arrow and photographs every item with an L-scale before it is moved.

Browse the full rubric set → · How this becomes an A–F grade →

3 · A real lab-notebook page

The artifact a student builds, keeps, and defends.

The lab notebook isn’t busywork — it’s the primary record, kept in pen at the bench and defended out loud. Here is one real Lab Day, every section kept live — note the struck-through first spot that sat in the solvent and the honest sources of error.

Oct 4 Chromatography of a pen ink
Question
Is the black ink on the note a single dye or a mixture?
Hypothesis
Black inks are usually blends — the chromatogram should separate into several colors.
Materials
Filter-paper strip; black pen; water solvent; beaker; ruler; pencil baseline.
Procedure
1. Spot ink above a pencil baseline. 2. Stand the strip in shallow water. 3. Mark the solvent front; measure the bands. ↪ spotted too low first — ink sat in the water, redid
Observations & data
BandDistance (cm)Rf
solvent front8.0
blue6.40.80
red4.60.58
yellow2.70.34
Labeled sketch: the strip with three separated color bands.
Analysis
The black ink split into blue, red, and yellow — three components with distinct Rf values. “Black” was a mixture, and each Rf is a fingerprint of a dye.
Conclusion
The ink is a blend of at least three dyes. Rf values could compare it to a suspect pen — but a match is consistency, not proof.
Sources of error
The first spot sat in the solvent and washed out — redone above the water line. Rf depends on solvent and paper, so comparisons must use the same setup.
A model entry. One Lab Day, kept live at the bench — graded against seven habits and defended at year’s end.
  • Dated & titled entries
  • A testable question & hypothesis
  • Units on every number
  • Significant figures, honestly reported
  • Calculations shown, not just answers
  • Pen in real time — struck, not erased
  • Error analysis with direction & size

See the lab-notebook starter →

4 · A real demonstration

The moment that can’t be faked.

Three times a year, a student performs and defends a demonstration — standing with their own work and reasoning aloud while an adult asks unscripted follow-ups. In the timed scene processing, they work a mock scene and its evidence set under the clock, documenting and justifying every call as they go.

“I ran a grid search so I wouldn’t miss a corner, sketched the room to scale with a north arrow, and shot every item with an L-scale before moving it. The shoe print by the window I photographed and cast first — it’s fragile and near the entry, so it’s the piece most likely to be lost if I wait.”

A passing answer from the timed scene-processing defense — justifying the order of work and the documentation, not reciting a definition.

Read the demonstration rubric →

5 · What you’d print

The whole pack, ready for a binder.

Everything here is on the web to read — and every rubric, checklist, and guide also has a print-ready packet version, formatted 8.5×11 for a clipboard or a three-ring binder. You assemble the student’s binder from the pack itself; there’s nothing else to buy to hold it in your hands. We’ve put them all in binder order on one page: Assemble the Forensic Science binder →

Seen enough to start?

The whole Forensic Science pack is open to read and print. Open it and begin, or ask us a question first — a real person answers.