Skip to main content
Bright Minds. Earth Science Earth Science course pack
See it before you commit

Look inside the Earth Science pack.

No sign-up, no email required. Here is a real week, a real rubric, a real lab-notebook page, and a real demonstration — the actual materials, not a brochure. Every sample links to the full artifact it’s drawn from.

1 · A real week

One week, two days on the Earth.

The course runs on a two-day pulse — about two hours a day, across roughly 32 weeks. Here is week one of Unit 1 — Earth’s Structure & Plate Tectonics: the student reads the Earth’s own record for real before a single boundary type is memorized.

Concept Day · ~2 hrs
Meet the Earth’s interior and its moving plates as one system — crust, mantle, and core by composition; lithosphere and asthenosphere by behavior. Work through what divergent, convergent, and transform boundaries each produce, and why earthquakes and volcanoes cluster where they do.
  • Earth’s layers & plate boundaries
  • Seafloor spreading & paleomagnetism
  • Reading: Wegener & continental drift
Field & Lab Day · ~2 hrs
Triangulate a real earthquake from three seismograms, then map the plate boundary the data point to. You locate the epicenter from P- and S-wave arrivals before the textbook tells you where it is — the map follows the measurement, not the other way around.
  • Read P- & S-wave arrivals
  • Triangulate the epicenter
  • Interpret a plate-boundary map

See the full course map →

2 · A real rubric

How “mastered” is actually judged.

Every skill is scored at one of three levels against a published bar — no points, no curve. Here is one criterion from the Earth’s Structure & Plate Tectonics rubric — lab technique: triangulation & maps — shown exactly the way a parent or guide reads it:

LevelWhat it looks like — “Read a seismogram & map”
DevelopingCannot read a seismogram or a plate-boundary map.
ProficientReads the traces but misplaces the epicenter or the boundary.
MasteryTriangulates an epicenter from three seismograms and interprets a plate-boundary map, defending each call.

Browse the full rubric set → · How this becomes an A–F grade →

3 · A real lab-notebook page

The artifact a student builds, keeps, and defends.

The lab notebook isn’t busywork — it’s the primary record, kept in pen at the bench and defended out loud. Here is one real Field & Lab Day, every section kept live — note the struck-through streak-test slip and the honest sources of error.

Oct 10 Identifying an unknown mineral
Question
What is mineral sample #4?
Hypothesis
Its metallic look and heft suggest an iron oxide — the streak and hardness tests should decide.
Materials
Sample #4; streak plate; glass plate; steel nail; hand lens; magnet.
Procedure
1. Note luster & color. 2. Streak on unglazed tile. 3. Test hardness against nail & glass. 4. Test with a magnet. ↪ first streak too faint — pressed harder, redid
Observations & data
TestResult
Lustermetallic
Streakdark reddish-brown
Hardness~6 (scratches glass, not nail)
Magnetweakly attracted
Labeled sketch: the reddish-brown streak mark on the plate.
Analysis
Metallic luster + reddish-brown streak + hardness ~6 + weak magnetism point to hematite, not magnetite (which has a black streak and is strongly magnetic).
Conclusion
Sample #4 is hematite — the reddish-brown streak is the deciding test.
Sources of error
The streak was faint at first (too light a pass). Hardness is approximate — “between glass and steel” brackets it near 6.
A model entry. One Field & Lab Day, kept live at the bench — graded against seven habits and defended at year’s end.
  • Dated & titled entries
  • A testable question & hypothesis
  • Units on every number
  • Significant figures, honestly reported
  • Calculations shown, not just answers
  • Pen in real time — struck, not erased
  • Error analysis with direction & size

See the lab-notebook starter →

4 · A real demonstration

The moment that can’t be faked.

Three times a year, a student performs and defends a demonstration — standing with their own work and reasoning aloud while an adult asks unscripted follow-ups. In the timed map interpretation, they triangulate an earthquake from three seismograms and defend the epicenter they place.

“P-waves reached all three stations first; the S–P gaps put me 180, 240, and 310 km out. Where the three arcs cross is the epicenter — right along the ridge, which fits: that’s a divergent boundary, so shallow quakes are exactly what I’d expect.”

A passing answer from the timed map-interpretation defense — reasoning from the seismograms and the boundary, not reciting a definition.

Read the demonstration rubric →

5 · What you’d print

The whole pack, ready for a binder.

Everything here is on the web to read — and every rubric, checklist, and guide also has a print-ready packet version, formatted 8.5×11 for a clipboard or a three-ring binder. You assemble the student’s binder from the pack itself; there’s nothing else to buy to hold it in your hands. We’ve put them all in binder order on one page: Assemble the Earth Science binder →

Seen enough to start?

The whole Earth Science pack is open to read and print. Open it and begin, or ask us a question first — a real person answers.